Everybody’s gushing about Obama’s performance at the Correspondents’ Dinner the other night, which completely upstaged Jay Leno (who wouldn’t?). And justifiably so! He’s very funny, his jokes were a little sharper than I’d expect from somebody in his position, and it’s absolutely worth watching.

That said, he has some work to do before next year’s dinner, and it doesn’t help to pretend otherwise. I don’t think his comic timing is absolutely down, and he starts smiling before the punchline more than anyone this side of Jimmy Fallon. But still, he far exceeds what a person can reasonably expect for intentional laughs from one’s president.

I’ve had a longstanding problem with using much modern political satire in the classroom, because I have a hard time finding good examples from the right side of the political aisle. Conservative satire seems so rare to begin with, and most of it that you can find is just too clumsy, ineffective, unfunny and/or (oops!) racist that it isn’t worth it. (And no, Sarah Palin, Rush calling Democrats “retards” does not qualify as satire.)

But leave it to the Republican National Committee (the people who brought you Michael Steele’s hip-hopping genius) to give us GOP Valentines.

Now, you might be thinking, “Isn’t it troubling when even Republicans in love can’t stop thinking about their hatred of libruls long enough to send a Valentine’s Day card?” But I think any attempt at humor from the GOP that doesn’t involve watermelons should be applauded.

My favorite, after the jump.

(more…)

In response to Peggy Noonan’s claim that Obama should have simply tried to make insurance companies abandon their restrictions on patients with pre-existing conditions, Uwe E. Reinhardt explains why it’s not that simple:

She seems completely unaware that, to be implemented, that step has to be accompanied by (1) a mandate to be insured or, at the least, very powerful financial incentives to be insured. And if government imposes such a mandate on citizens, it must be ready (2) to subsidize low-income families in the acquisition of the mandated insurance. Already we have a bill requiring many pages.

To me, that’s a very helpful way of explaining to lay people like myself, who aren’t thrilled at the prospect of a massive insurance bill but don’t understand the nuances of the issue especially well, why such a bill is necessary even if your goals are relatively modest.

This then moves the debate to a different place, in my mind: if we are forced to go to great trouble and expense to get access to people with pre-existing conditions, is it worth it? If we decide it is, then it’s probably worth having the government involved. But Reinhardt’s point makes me more suspicious of Republican claims that we could just have the parts of the Health Care Reform Bill that everyone agrees on.

I’d have gotten to this sooner, but I’ve been sick and busy.

Here are my thoughts (after the jump) on Obama’s speech, Joe Wilson’s outburst, and the ongoing conversation about civility and public discourse. Here’s the video, though of course you’ve all seen it:

1. Obama’s speech was, from my perspective, highly effective. So of course it was completely overshadowed by Joe Wilson, from the great state of South Carolina.
(more…)

A fascinatingly transparent example today of how the media arm of the extreme right wants to win back power: through lies, lies, lies. Sometimes subtle ones. Here’s what you would see first if you clicked on the Drudge Report today:

Drudge_Economy_1

If you were a person who went to Drudge first for news, you might conclude that the “revision” to the “economy” cited in the headline referred to the economy now. And if you’re the sort of person who doesn’t really read economic stories, you might not discover that the story in question is about the first year of the recession, under the Bush Administration, not this year. And you certainly might not click on the tiny story down below, which I’ve circled in red:

Picture 5 copy

And if you didn’t click on that story, you wouldn’t know that the economy shrank half as much as expected in the second quarter of this year.

In other words, the news is that the recession was worse than we thought under Bush, and is getting better, faster than we thought under Obama. And the way Drudge chooses to represent this news is with Depression-era photos of poor people in ration lines.

Michael Steele is asked a straightforward, softball question, and cannot even come up with some boilerplate answer:

Tones, themes, and approaches they can do. Just don’t expect, er, governance.

While I agree with the long-term principle that Democrats shouldn’t cede national security to the Republicans, the benefits of Obama keeping the Bush-appointed Robert Gates in his Defense Secretary position have been greater than I would’ve expected. They now include, thanks to Obama, Gates, and a surprising number of senators, killing the F-22 fighter jet. This is a classic example of federal money being spent not to make us safer, but to keep senators in the Senate:

The amendment to halt the plane’s production was co-sponsored by Sens. Carl Levin, D-Mich., and John McCain, R-Ariz. McCain, who has never been an F-22 fan, went so far as to quote at some length President Dwight Eisenhower’s farewell address, which warned of the “military-industrial complex,” though McCain noted that the proper phrase should be the “military-industrial-congressional complex.”

That’s really what the F-22 has come to be about. The Air Force shrewdly spread the plane’s contracts to firms in 46 states, thus giving a solid majority of senators—and a lot of House members, too—a financial (and, therefore, electoral) stake in the program’s survival.

I’m pretty surprised they managed to scrap this thing. Fred Kaplan has the story over at Slate.

Or something like that.

Warning! Do not follow this link if you’re in Firefox! 3QuarksDaily and Jezebel have been freezing my machine in Firefox, but work fine in Safari. No commentary here; these are just facts.

UPDATE: And apparently she did, so everybody’s happy.

So the Young Republicans are going to elect a new president. I know what you’re asking: does it include a scandal? Yes!

Thirty-eight-year-old Audra Shay’s campaign to become the next chairman of the Young Republicans went from obscure to infamous over the past week, after The Daily Beast revealed details of posts of her Facebook account. Specifically, a thread where one of her friends posts that ““Obama Bin Lauden [sic] is the new terrorist… Muslim is on there side [sic]… need to take this country back from all of these mad coons… and illegals,” and Shay responds eight minutes later with: “You tell em Eric! lol.”

But here’s the scandal nobody’s talking about: the president of the Young Republicans can be thirty-eight?

Sarah Palin stories are like the Terminator series: however much you think, “god, this is even dumber than the last one,” you know that there’s a small, dedicated fan base guaranteeing that there will be another before too long.

However, given that I dedicated a healthy part of Panoptiblog’s infancy to the presidential race, I feel I should say something about the fact that Sarah Palin quit her job last week. Why she would do such a thing is anybody’s guess. An oncoming scandal? A sincere desire to quit politics? A plan to run for President?

It is, of course, that last question that draws most people in; otherwise, she’d be just another odd political story. The Daily Beast‘s Joe Mathews and The Weekly Standard‘s Bill Kristol have claimed this might be a “shrewd” or even “brilliant” move to get into the White House. Mathews’ evidence for this is what her expected 2012 primary opponents are doing:

Gov. Bobby Jindal’s response to President Obama’s January address got terrible reviews in part because he was being evaluated not as the nation’s youngest governor but as a presidential candidate. By comparison, the Republicans who look strongest are those who are already running free and clear—2008 campaign veterans and very former governors Mitt Romney and Mike Huckabee.

Yes, though he seems to forget that the latter two served their terms and didn’t run for re-election; they didn’t walk off the job. Ross Douthat, on the other hand, views the whole thing with regret:

Had she refused John McCain, Palin would still be a popular female governor in a Republican Party starved for future stars. Her scandals would be the stuff of local politics, her daughter’s pregnancy a minor story in the Lower 48, her son Trig’s parentage a nonissue even for conspiracy theorists. There would still be plenty of time to ease into the national spotlight, to bone up on the issues, and to craft a persona more appealing than the Mrs. Spiro Agnew role the McCain campaign assigned to her.

What strikes me is that both sentiments above, and Palin’s resignation itself, unthinkingly puts potential for running and campaigning for election above actually governing. What will Palin do now? Oh, she’ll go around the country helping more conservatives get elected. But what good is that to them, if said conservatives quit rather than govern, in the name of more campaigning? And Douthat’s willingness to believe that all she needs is a little “boning up” is pretty hard to swallow.

Strangely, it seems to me that the effect of this on her chances of getting the Republican nomination is probably negligible. If the fact that she could name no Supreme Court decision other than Roe v. Wade, and that she had command of exactly zero issues didn’t dissuade them before, resigning a year or two early is doubtful to matter (and nor will her confidence that, if she were President, the “department of law” would take care of her… *sigh*). Republican primary voters are a small block of the party, and are further to the right than Republican voters at large; just as Democratic primary voters are further to the left. It would certainly be a general election issue.

The video of her absolutely incoherent speech is after the jump. Watch any random couple of minutes, if you can bear it. It’s worth seeing and hearing, if only because one forgets exactly how awful the experience is. She makes Bush sound like Churchill.

(more…)

Next Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.