This TED talk has to be one of the most interesting on the website (I’d embed it, but it uses (gasp!) Flash). Nicholas Christakis studies how social networks shape us. He was part of the group whose study about obesity made headlines a couple of years ago (though he mentions some caveats, in the talk, about how it was received). Related to my research in some obvious ways, but accessible to a mainstream audience. Implications for education abound…

There’s also a story in the current issue of Harvard Magazine about Christakis and his colleagues. One tidbit:

A more lighthearted study led by a member of Christakis’s lab group searched for meaning behind users’ decisions to make their Facebook profiles public or restrict who can view them. It found that users with public profiles had a higher-than-average chance of listing the Beatles, Pink Floyd, and Led Zeppelin among their favorite musical artists, whereas people who restricted access to their profiles were more likely to list Coldplay, Rage Against the Machine, and Ray Charles.

Make of that what you will. What about Radiohead?

In an otherwise pretty cool story linked to the front page of CNN.com today, Breeanna Hare writes this by way of introducing rockstar literacy researcher danah boyd:

Ethnographer danah boyd, who does not capitalize her name, said she watched the class divide emerge while conducting research of American teens’ use of social networks in 2006.

Seriously? That clause couldn’t be a note at the end of the article?

You know what, let me go back and revise the first sentence of this post…

In an otherwise pretty cool story linked to the front page of CNN.com today, Breeanna Hare, who spells her first name in an unusual way, writes this by way of introducing rockstar literacy researcher danah boyd:

Uh-Oh.

Reading along in an otherwise innocuous interview with Denver Broncos coach Josh McDaniels, I came across this:

On his Twitter policy for the Broncos’ players
“I don’t really have a Twitter policy. I don’t know what it means. I don’t know what it is. I don’t know that ‘MyFace,’ ‘Spacebook’ or ‘Facebook’ stuff. I don’t really know what that is either. The league talks to (the players) about just trying to protect your career, family and all that stuff, so hopefully, they are doing the right things by what the league asks us to do.”

It seems to me that when you have an unhappy receiver who has (a) a desire to be traded, (b) a history of being a poor citizen, and (c) a blog, you should probably figure out what this whole (ahem) “Spacebook” thing is about.

a Supreme Court Justice retired. And it isn’t Stevens!

If you missed the first hundred days, Slate has a helpful summary, via Facebook.

McSweeny’s offers us the Facebook Hamlet.

At first glance I thought that Slate‘s Reihan Salam had just written a little cute piece about social networking, but it turns out there’s some really useful stuff in there. Like this little tidbit:

Say you’ve been too generous with your friending policy, and a gaggle of strangers is now hogging your News Feed. You too can launch a Great Facebook Purge. The beauty of this is that no headline or notification pops up in your ex-friend’s inbox announcing, “You’ve suffered a humiliating rejection at the hands of _________.” It’s all very stealthy, thus making it the perfect way to deal with promiscuous frienders.

It’s from last year, but the whole thing is worth reading, and should help protect you from this:

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.